Employee Engagement: A Shared Responsibility or HR’s Burden?
Employee Engagement: A Shared Responsibility or HR’s Burden?
Is the HR department the ‘Guardian’
of engagement? They are responsible for designing reward systems, creating incentive programmes,
organising staff welfare events, and conducting employee satisfaction surveys. In simple terms, the HR department is responsible for planning, organising, and
implementing all employee engagement initiatives. True engagement is
emotional—it’s about how employees feel about their work, their leaders, and
the organisation’s values. HR alone cannot build this deeper connection; it
requires collective nurturing (Hearn, 2020).
Organisations realise that engagement is not simply a "nice-to-have" but rather a critical factor in retention, performance, and creativity as the labor market grows more competitive and employee expectations continue to change. One crucial question remains: is HR the only one responsible for it? Or do managers, leaders, and employees all work together to promote employee engagement? (hrcloud, 2025).
'’Employee engagement is not just a buzzword; it's a holistic approach that requires coordinated efforts across all levels of the organization. From senior leaders to employees, everyone plays a critical role in shaping engagement, aligning efforts, and driving success (Russo, 2025).’’ Then why does everyone still point to HR when something goes wrong?
The Role of Leadership
The leadership styles of many Sri
Lankan organisations still have strong hierarchical impacts. However, today's
employees, especially the younger generation, cherish open communication,
inclusivity, and appreciation. It is sometimes difficult for leaders who are
overly controlling or unpleasant to promote genuine engagement. Nevertheless,
leaders who are open, compassionate, and purposeful have the ability to alter
their organisations' cultures. When workers believe their leaders genuinely
care about their growth and well-being, they are more likely to be loyal and
dedicated in Sri Lankan businesses.
The Role of Managers
Middle managers serve as the bridge between staff and
upper management. Employees seek advice, direction, encouragement, and
criticism from their direct bosses. To maintain consistent engagement, managers
should pay attention, respect values, and identify challenges of their team
members and should maintain a trustworthy relationship. Regretfully, a lot of
organizations ignore this aspect of leadership development.
‘Employees don’t leave organizations—they leave
managers.’ This highlights how crucial it is for managers to have the
capabilities to inspire trust, provide recognition, and create a sense of
belonging within the team.
The Role of Employees
In the modern workplace, true
engagement occurs when employees do more than just do their duties and responsibilities
for pay. They start to take genuine ownership of their contribution when they
really feel the sense of purpose, belongingness, and responsibility. At this point, engagement becomes genuine;
employees are motivated to complete their responsibilities because they care
about the results and the success of the company, not just because they
"have to".
The Role of HR
An HR leader’s role is to facilitate
and enable employee engagement – not to carry the whole burden. Sri Lankan HR
specialists are able to create systems that support diversity, justice, and
fairness. They can develop learning opportunities that make people feel
appreciated and offer data-driven insights to leadership. However, even the
best HR initiatives will fail if managers, employees, and leaders do not
support them.
A Shared Effort
Like anywhere else, employee involvement in Sri Lanka needs to be a shared responsibility. HR creates the structure, managers maintain the relationship, leaders mould the culture, and employees bring the passion. When these factors are aligning together, engagement becomes a part of the organisation’s identity. Finally, engagement cannot be forced or purchased. It must be built, lived, and shared.
Reference
Russo, G. (Oct 7, 2025) Who
is Responsible for Employee Engagement? A Comprehensive Guide sparkbay at https://sparkbay.com/en/culture-blog/whos-responsible-employee-engagement-65.[Accessed
November 7, 2025].
Hearn, S. (11 March 2020) Employee engagement isn’t just HR’s responsibility Personnel Today [Online] at https://www.personneltoday.com/hr/responsibility-for-employee-engagement-hr/#:~:text=Senior%20leaders%20are%20responsible%20for,and%20boost%20their%20own%20engagement. [Accessed November 7, 2025].
Hrcloud, 2025. [Online] What Is Employee Engagement? A Complete Guide for HR Professionals [in 2025] available at https://www.hrcloud.com/blog/what-is-employee-engagement-complete-guide#:~:text=Who%20Drives%20Engagement?,and%20contributing%20to%20team%20health. [Accessed November 7, 2025)
E 283991


This article presents an important, modern viewpoint by arguing that, particularly in the hierarchical Sri Lankan context, employee engagement is a shared organizational responsibility rather than just HR's burden. In order to foster the emotional bond that propels sincere, meaningful engagement, it outlines the different but interconnected roles of managers (building relationships), leaders (shaping culture), and HR (facilitating structure).
ReplyDeleteI appreciate your careful analysis. I absolutely believe that active participation from all stakeholders is necessary for engagement to flourish in a hierarchical setting like Sri Lanka. HR can create the framework, but managers' and leaders' daily behaviours are what really influence the work environment. Organisations are better equipped to create the emotional bond that fosters sincere, long-lasting involvement when all three function in unison.
DeleteThis is such an important blog post. Engagement thrives when HR, leaders, and employees all play their part. It’s truly a shared responsibility. Employee engagement often gets pushed onto HR, but the truth is that managers and leaders have far more day-to-day influence.
ReplyDeleteThank you Charundya for your comment. Indeed, I concur. As an HR professional, I have frequently witnessed this firsthand: HR is supposed to plan and organise every engagement activity, and the HR leader is ultimately responsible when something doesn't go as planned. This is precisely the reason it's critical to acknowledge engagement as an organisational endeavour rather than a departmental responsibility.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThe emphasis on collaboration among HR, leaders, managers, and employees is valuable, and this is a comprehensive conversation on staff engagement. A more balanced approach would also be offered by considering potential difficulties in aligning these functions in hierarchical or resource-constrained contexts.
ReplyDeleteAs someone working in hotels, I see every day how engagement is shaped not just by HR policies but by the way leaders, managers, and staff interact with each other. In hospitality, our frontline employees are the face of the brand—they create the guest experience. If they don’t feel valued, supported, and connected to the bigger purpose, it shows immediately in service quality. HR can set the framework, but it’s the daily actions of managers and the culture leaders create that make engagement real. For us, engagement isn’t a buzzword—it’s the difference between a guest who feels welcome and one who never returns. That’s why I believe engagement must be shared across all levels, lived in the lobby, the kitchen, and the boardroom alike
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete