Job Security vs. Performance: What Drives Sri Lankan Employees Today?



INTRODUCTION

The private and public sectors in Sri Lanka exhibit different motivational dynamics. Compared to government workforce, who usually place more importance on job security and stability, private sector employees place a higher value on performance, recognition, and career advancement

Observations

Aspect

Government Sector (Public)

Private Sector

Purpose

Provide public goods/services, not profit

Generate profit

Benefits

High job security, pensions, healthcare

Higher salaries, performance-based perks

Work Environment

Fixed hours, less stressful

Dynamic, high pressure

Growth

Slower promotions, structured career

Faster growth, better pay potential

The difference between these two sectors can be explained by using two conventional theories of motivation commonly applied in psychology and HR management: Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and Herzberg’s two-factor theory.

According to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, individuals move from basic needs up to self-fulfillment. Many public-sector employees in Sri Lanka continue to prioritize their safety needs, such as job permanence, pension, and steady income. Heisenberg's two-factor theory says that these are hygiene elements, which are important to avoid discontent but not enough to make people work hard or necessary to drive high achievement. 




Whereas, private-sector employees are generally in work environments where achievement, recognition, and advancement are vital; these align with motivators in Herzberg’s model and higher-order needs in Maslow’s framework. For example, a study of banking employees in Sri Lanka found that “job satisfaction of private sector employees was higher in comparison to public sector” employees. ResearchGate



In the public sector, there is evidence of moderate satisfaction but also concern about appraisal and promotion systems. Among Sri Lankan public health officers, over half of the sample reported neutral satisfaction, and many were dissatisfied with the appraisal system, salary increments, and promotion schemes. Juniper Publishers

However, another research was conducted among bank employees in the Anuradhapura district. The study found that employees in public sector banks are more satisfied than those in private banks primarily due to factors such as job security, social recognition, remuneration, and other benefits (Weerasinghe & Senevirathne & Dedunu, 2017).

A comparative analysis found that, while rewards and job security did not significantly differ between public and private sector employees, career growth opportunities and workplace attributes did show significant differences—emphasizing that private-sector employees may prioritize growth more. SSRN

Conclusion

Sri Lankan employees’ motives exhibit the balance between job security and performance. People who work for the government are motivated by stability and predictability, while people who work for private companies are driven by advancement, recognition, and accomplishment. By combining powerful growth and recognition programs with a safe foundation, HR professionals and policymakers may come up with a better way to motivate employees in both industries.




References

Rajapaksa, S., & Kalyanaratne, A. (2024). Impact of job satisfaction on turnover intention among employees: A comparative study of private and public bank employees in Sri Lanka. ResearchGate. ResearchGate+1. [Online] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2978608. [Accessed 05 November 2025].

Weerasinghe, I., & Senavirathna, C., & Deduni, H. (2017). Factors Affecting to Job Satisfaction of Banking Employees in Sri Lanka Special Reference Public and Private Banks In Anuradhapura District [Online] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2978608. [Accessed 05 November 2025 ].

Nawaz, N. (2022). Effect of work motivation on employee job satisfaction in the context of public sector organizations (CEB) in Sri Lanka. SSRN. SSRN


E 283991


Comments

  1. Using Maslow's and Herzberg's models appropriately, this blog provides a pertinent, theory-driven comparison of employee motivation in Sri Lanka's public and private sectors. The basic distinction is highlighted: the private sector is motivated by performance, achievement, and growth (motivators), whereas the public sector prioritizes job security (hygiene factors). This suggests that HR strategies need to be tailored for each situation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment. If the private sector needs to attract young talent, there must be a strategic plan for how employees are retained. and motivated. There is no doubt that the government sector provides job security, which most employees would prefer at present. Natural disasters are top evidence.

      Delete
  2. A fascinating read! I appreciate how you contrast performance and job security as sources of motivation for Sri Lankan workers in the public and private sectors. The analysis is made evident by the link to Maslow and Herzberg, and HR professionals can benefit greatly from the practical ideas on striking a balance between stability and growth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment. As you mentioned, private sector HR professionals as well as government policymakers have a responsibility to balance both sectors.

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is a well-structured and insightful analysis of how job security and performance influence employee motivation in Sri Lanka’s public and private sectors. The comparison between the two sectors is clearly presented, and the use of Maslow’s hierarchy and Herzberg’s two-factor theory strengthens the academic grounding of the discussion. The inclusion of local research findings adds strong relevance and credibility. Overall, the blog effectively highlights the distinct motivational drivers in each sector and offers meaningful implications for HR professionals and policymakers. A well-written and informative piece.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your valuable comment. In Sri Lanka, job opportunities are very limited compared to other developed countries. In developed countries, if an employee feels the job is not satisfactory, they just leave within a day. But in Sri Lanka, finding a good job is hard, and retention is most critical by maintaining job satisfaction. Therefore, HR leaders have a crucial role to play in considering employee needs.

      Delete
  5. As someone working in hospitality, I found this article very relevant. In hotels, we see both sides of the coin every day—our teams value the stability of a secure job, but they also thrive when performance is recognized through promotions, incentives, or even a simple ‘thank you’ from management. Job security builds trust, but it’s performance recognition that keeps people motivated to go the extra mile for guests. The balance between these two is what really drives service excellence in our industry, and I think Sri Lanka’s broader workforce reflects the same dynamic

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your insightful comment based on your sector. The pandemic taught a good lesson about how the private sector (including the hotel industry) treats their employees, and it is directly related to the matter of job security. "A true smile by heart is important for guest relations": to keep the employee motivation and job satisfaction, HR leaders should have a strategic plan which should be realistic and sustainable.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Performance Management: Accountability or Anxiety ?

Is Global HR Digitization Threatening Employee Privacy in Sri Lanka?